
NGOs in the modern definition, spring from the United Nations and act as certified consultants for the United Nations; no government representatives are allowed as members. However, NGOs are hardly independent as most of them are funded by governments. In other words, our tax dollars are paying for our own demise through the UN Agenda 21 programs. This is how the scam works:
NGOs are treacherous and they lie. While an NGO may take the right action with one hand, the other hand is reaching out and grabbing your liberty by allocating its vast resources to advance the UN agenda. For example, the IUCN, the center of all UN NGOs, claims on their website that they have a moratorium on further release of GMOs, which makes them seem like they are against GMOs. GMOs have already contaminated much of the world, so a moratorium on further release of GMOs is a feeble attempt to rid the world of GMOs and NGOs pretend they have no power when more regulations are created to advance the UN agenda.
Instead of taking serious action to combat GMOs, the IUCN allocates their resources toward promoting biodiversity, (the theft of private property by way of the Endangered Species Act) and global warming, which has been thoroughly discredited.
The WWF(World Wildlife Federation) keeps a low profile on their website about GMOs, but the WWF does fully endorse GMOs.
Greenpeace is a UN accredited NGO, and like all UN affiliated NGOs Greenpeace is dedicated to the policies of the UN's Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. In order to appear that they are working in the publics interest, they oppose GMOs and have taken some small actions, like publicizing the dangers of GMOs and pressuring the Trader Joe's food chain stores into refusing GMO food for their private label. However, their opposition to GMOs, according to Michael Shaw of "www.FreedomAdvocates.org", is an example of painting themselves as a public interest group to cover up their true intent, the implementation of Agenda 21. On their website they endorse global warming lies and energy restrictions that support consolidation of globalist power. While their website claims that they do not solicit contributions from governments or corporations, there is proof that they have received grants from the Tides Foundation (Rockefeller Foundation is major a contributor), BP Oil and Exxon, but these donors are not listed on their website. In other words, Greenpeace, along with many other environmental NGOs, receive donations from globalists and funnel money into other like-minded NGOs and non-profit organizations to accomplish Agenda 21.
Michael Shaw pointed out that tax exempt organizations are increasing exponentially in order to capitalize on government funding, however, this makes tax exempt organizations beholden to the government. Public-Private Partnerships, or the coupling between government and private enterprise is the foundation of fascism. Non profits often fit the political/economic definition of Public-Private Partnership.
Philanthropic tax exempt foundations have been working toward the destruction of America for many decades. In the 1950's a Congressional investigation into the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie Foundations was conducted with scandalous results, so the information was suppressed. However, G. Edward Griffin was able to obtain an interview with Senator Norman Dodd, one of the lead investigators, on video and in a written transcript
Some non-profit tax exempt 501(c)3 organizations have been known to engage in controlled opposition. For example, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) represented farmers in opposition to Monsanto in the Supreme Court GMO alfalfa case and in many other anti-GMO cases. While we have no way of knowing whether Andrew Kimbrell, the Executive Director of CFS and his brother George (of counsel) performed solid work in opposing Monsanto or whether they sandbagged the endeavor, there are reports that CFS and its parent company have taken in $1.75 million dollars from the John Merck Fund, which has ties to the Rockefeller Family Fund. Andrew Kimbrell of CFS filed a petition with the EPA to ban colloidal silver which is a natural antibiotic agent with many benefits that competes directly with Mercks dubious pharmaceutical drugs. This organization has the appearance of working in the publics interest, but in a separate action, it has operated in opposition to public benefit.
Further, Andrew Kimbrell reported reported a success in the Supreme Court GMO alfalfa ruling. He said that GMO alfalfa is still illegal to plant. While this is true today, the USDA has only to complete its Environmental Impact Study in order to approve the seeds.
Beware as almost all major environmental groups are pursuing the objectives of Agenda 21, even when they oppose GMOs. It is important to do a little bit of research to determine their motives to avoid being fooled.
end of page